Humanloop alternatives
A practical migration guide for teams looking for Humanloop alternatives: observability, eval workflows, prompt management, and regulated governance paths.
For teams migrating prompt/eval workflows and deciding what to standardize for regulated production.
Dernière mise à jour: 17 déc. 2025 · Version v1.0 · Pas d'avis juridique.
Comment utiliser cette page
- If you used Humanloop for prompt iteration, eval loops, or run tracking, you can usually migrate without rewriting your whole stack.
- The key decision is whether you need developer observability only, or workflow governance + audit-grade evidence exports.
Liste de contrôle des migrations
Les étapes minimales pour éviter de perdre des connaissances institutionnelles.
- Export prompts, versions, datasets, and evaluation results.
- Define how you will track runs in production (OpenTelemetry, traces, or gateway logs).
- Decide where approvals/overrides live (and how they are captured as evidence).
- Define sampling policy and reviewer rubric for post-market monitoring.
- Run an “evidence export drill” before an audit (manifest + checksums + redaction).
Options recommandées par cas d'utilisation
Choisissez la couche dont vous avez besoin.
Observability & evals
Langfuse, LangSmith, Phoenix, Weave, Braintrust, PromptLayer: strong choices for tracing/evals/prompt iteration.
Gateway layer
Portkey, LiteLLM, Helicone: useful if you need provider abstraction and request guardrails.
Regulated workflow governance
KLA is built for policy-as-code checkpoints, review queues, sampling controls, and verifiable evidence exports.