Evidence pack checklist (what auditors ask for, and how KLA generates it)
Download an evidence pack checklist: what auditors ask for, minimum vs gold-standard evidence, and how KLA generates verifiable exports.
Assemble an auditor-ready evidence pack checklist in 15 minutes.
For compliance, risk, product, and ML ops teams shipping agentic workflows into regulated environments.
Dernière mise à jour : 16 déc. 2025 - Version v1.0 - Exemple fictif. Ne constitue pas un avis juridique.
Signaler un problème : /contact
Ce qu'est cet artefact (et quand vous en avez besoin)
Explication minimale viable, écrite pour les audits, pas pour la théorie.
This checklist is the “conversion hub” for audit readiness: what auditors typically request, grouped by theme, and structured as minimum → strong → gold-standard evidence.
Use it to spot gaps fast and to standardize what your team can export on demand.
Vous en avez besoin quand
- You’re getting procurement or audit questions and need a consistent package.
- Your evidence is scattered across tools and you need an exportable bundle.
- You want to map Annex IV claims to actual runtime evidence and review records.
Common failure mode
Evidence exists, but it’s scattered across wikis and dashboards with no manifest, no checksums, and no reproducible “what ran when” trail.
À quoi ressemble un bon résultat
Les évaluateurs des critères d'acceptation vérifient réellement.
- Covers system description, risk management, oversight, validation, monitoring, change control, and logging integrity.
- Defines minimum vs strong vs gold-standard per theme (easy to forward internally).
- Includes export instructions and verification steps (manifest + checksums).
- Links to the actual artifacts/templates used by the team (SOPs, policies, checklists).
Aperçu du modèle
Un véritable extrait en HTML donc il est indexable et revisible.
## 3) Human oversight records - Minimum: oversight SOP + intervention triggers + role definitions - Strong: review queue records (approve/reject/edit/override + rationale) - Gold: sampled review outcomes + disagreement handling + training evidence ## 7) Logging integrity proof & retention - Minimum: audit event taxonomy + retention policy - Strong: integrity mechanism documented + periodic verification reports - Gold: export bundles with manifests + checksums + verification steps
Comment le remplir (rapide)
Les entrées dont vous avez besoin, le temps de compléter, et un exemple de travail miniature.
Entrées dont vous avez besoin
- Your system inventory + owners.
- Locations of key artifacts (risk register, SOPs, runbooks, eval reports).
- Your export mechanism (what you can bundle + how you verify integrity).
Temps de réalisation : 10–20 minutes to draft, then iterate during export drills.
Mini example: evidence pack manifest entry
manifest.json (excerpt) - bundle_id: kla-export-2025-12-16-001 - includes: audit-log.ndjson, review-queue.csv, policy-pack.tar.gz - checksums: sha256:... - verify: recompute checksums; validate hash chain
Comment KLA le génère (Gouvern / Mesure / Prouve)
Attachez l'artefact aux primitifs pour qu'il se convertisse.
Govern
- Governance as enforceable controls (policy-as-code + approval gates), not spreadsheets.
- Change control links every version bump to an approval record.
Measure
- Sampling and near-miss metrics become measurable control effectiveness signals.
- Monitoring outcomes are recorded as evidence, not screenshots.
Prove
- Evidence Room exports package telemetry, approvals, and policies with a manifest + checksums.
- Append-only audit ledger provides tamper-evident proof of execution and interventions.
FAQ
Écrit pour gagner des réponses de style extrait.