Insurance
Claims · underwriting · fraud / SIU

Gate the claim, the price, and the SIU referral — at the authority line

Insurance AI does not fail in the abstract. It fails the moment a settlement clears above its limit, a price changes unreviewed, or a fraud referral goes out unchecked. KLA puts the approval threshold and the signed lineage exactly at the FNOL, settlement, and pricing decision.

01The lines AI keeps crossing

Three authority lines where an unreviewed action becomes a loss

Legal and risk teams do not object to automation in principle. They object to money-moving and customer-affecting decisions that cannot be intercepted, reviewed, or explained. KLA draws the line at exactly those moments.

A claim settlement above the delegated limit

Delegated authority limit

How KLA gates it

Held for a named approver before it pays out

What the record proves

Authority band, decision rationale, and signed lineage for the payout

A pricing or eligibility change

Material-impact threshold

How KLA gates it

Routed to underwriting review when it materially moves price or eligibility

What the record proves

The factors that moved the price and who approved the change

An SIU or fraud referral

Adverse-action line

How KLA gates it

Named reviewer before a customer is referred, fast-tracked, or denied for fraud

What the record proves

The AI risk signal, the human decision, and the basis for the referral

02Govern against the binding regime

Claims handling and pricing answer to different rulebooks

A single AI-governance checklist does not satisfy an insurer, because the obligation depends on what the agent is actually doing. Claims-intake triage is claims handling; risk assessment and pricing can be EU AI Act high-risk. KLA gates each decision against the regime that actually binds it.

Claims handling

NAIC AI Model Bulletin + state unfair-claims-practices law (Model #900)

A written AI Systems program and fair-handling duties govern routing, settlement, and denial — this is where KLA gates each FNOL and settlement decision.

Pricing and eligibility

EU AI Act Annex III(5)(c) for life-and-health risk assessment and pricing

Where an AI step performs the risk assessment or pricing the EU AI Act enumerates as high-risk, the human-oversight and record-keeping obligations attach.

The discrimination question is the one regulators ask first

The fastest-moving scrutiny in insurance is whether an AI model prices or selects risk in a way that proxies a protected class. Both the NAIC AI Model Bulletin and EU AI Act high-risk rules push you to create the records a fair-pricing review needs — the factors behind a pricing decision, the human accountable for it, and a path to reconstruct it. KLA captures exactly that at the moment the price or eligibility decision is made, instead of reverse-engineering it later.

Workflow blueprints

These reference blueprints walk through the exact runtime gates KLA applies to an insurance agent you already built — at first notice of loss and at the settlement recommendation — with contested fast-tracks, large settlements, and SIU fraud flags routed to a named approver before the action executes, and the lineage sealed as independently verifiable evidence. KLA governs the agent; it does not build or sell it.

Insurance AI Runtime Controls | KLA Digital