Annex IV template: HR screening
Download an Annex IV technical documentation template tailored to HR screening: ranking, interview scoring, fairness evidence, oversight, monitoring, and logging.
Draft an HR screening Annex IV doc you can review in ~60 minutes.
For compliance, risk, product, and ML ops teams shipping agentic workflows into regulated environments.
Dernière mise à jour : 16 déc. 2025 - Version v1.0 - Exemple fictif. Ne constitue pas un avis juridique.
Signaler un problème : /contact
Ce qu'est cet artefact (et quand vous en avez besoin)
Explication minimale viable, écrite pour les audits, pas pour la théorie.
A system-type Annex IV template for hiring/HR screening: rankings, scoring, recommendations, and the evidence you need for oversight and fairness reviews.
It keeps the focus on controls and proof: disclosures, reviewer workflows, and traceability across versions.
Vous en avez besoin quand
- Your system screens, ranks, or scores candidates or influences hiring decisions.
- You need to show oversight, explainability, and fairness-oriented evaluation evidence.
- You are preparing internal governance reviews or external audits.
Common failure mode
HR systems ship without explicit boundaries ("not solely automated"), without oversight triggers, and without defensible evidence about evaluation and bias/fairness checks.
À quoi ressemble un bon résultat
Les évaluateurs des critères d'acceptation vérifient réellement.
- Outputs are explicit (rankings/scores) and boundaries are explicit (what is not automated).
- Data minimization and sensitive data handling are defined.
- Fairness-related checks and thresholds are documented (where applicable).
- Oversight rules define always-review vs sampled review and recorded rationale.
- Logs and exports can prove which model/policy version produced a recommendation.
Aperçu du modèle
Un véritable extrait en HTML donc il est indexable et revisible.
## 4) Performance metrics & thresholds - Validity metrics (fit-for-purpose) - Fairness checks (where applicable) - Calibration and error analysis ## Evidence pointers - Oversight records (approvals, overrides, escalation) - Candidate disclosure artifacts + UI proof (if applicable)
Comment le remplir (rapide)
Les entrées dont vous avez besoin, le temps de compléter, et un exemple de travail miniature.
Entrées dont vous avez besoin
- A clear statement of intended purpose + boundaries (especially for hiring decisions).
- Your data sources and retention windows.
- Evaluation approach and threshold governance.
- Oversight SOP and monitoring plan references.
Temps de réalisation : 45–90 minutes for v1.
Mini example: boundary statement
Boundary: - The system provides recommendations only. - Humans make final hiring decisions. - Always-review: any rejection recommendation with confidence < 0.7.
Comment KLA le génère (Gouvern / Mesure / Prouve)
Attachez l'artefact aux primitifs pour qu'il se convertisse.
Govern
- Policy-as-code checkpoints that block or require review for high-risk actions.
- Versioned change control for model/prompt/policy/workflow updates.
Measure
- Risk-tiered sampling reviews (baseline + burst during incidents or after changes).
- Near-miss tracking (blocked / nearly blocked steps) as a measurable control signal.
Prove
- Hash-chained, append-only audit ledger with 7+ year retention language where required.
- Evidence Room export bundles (manifest + checksums) so auditors can verify independently.
FAQ
Écrit pour gagner des réponses de style extrait.
Télécharger l'artefact
Markdown modifiable. Aucun courriel requis.
Download HR screening template