KLA vs Portkey
Portkey is a strong AI gateway/guardrails layer with production features like RBAC, audit logs, and exports. KLA governs workflow decisions with approvals and evidence exports for audits.
Gateways make requests safer. Regulated audits ask for decision governance: who approved, what policy applied, and what evidence proves it.
For ML platform teams centralizing model access, routing, spend controls, and request-level guardrails.
Ultimo aggiornamento: 17 dic 2025 · Versione v1.0 · Non costituisce consulenza legale.
A chi è rivolta questa pagina
Un inquadramento dal punto di vista dell'acquirente (non una denigrazione).
For ML platform teams centralizing model access, routing, spend controls, and request-level guardrails.
A cosa serve realmente Portkey
Basato sulla sua funzione principale (e dove si sovrappone).
Portkey is built for the gateway layer: routing requests across model providers, applying guardrails, standardizing access, and exporting logs for downstream uses. It also positions enterprise admin controls (like RBAC and audit logs) as part of its production stack.
Sovrapposizione
- Both can sit in a regulated stack: gateways govern requests; control planes govern business decisions and approvals.
- Both can contribute evidence. The question is whether you're exporting raw request logs or a deliverable-shaped evidence bundle for audits.
- Many teams use both: Portkey for provider access/routing and KLA for decision-time approval gates and evidence exports.
In cosa eccelle Portkey
Riconosciamo i punti di forza dello strumento, distinguendoli dai deliverable di audit.
- Gateway pattern: filter/fix/route requests to multiple model providers.
- Centralized guardrails and routing policy at the request layer.
- Enterprise administration features like RBAC/audit logs and log exports (plan/edition dependent).
- Centralizing model access controls (e.g., cataloging/allowlisting models) at the platform layer.
Dove i team regolamentati hanno ancora bisogno di un livello aggiuntivo
- Decision-level oversight: an enforceable approval gate for business actions (not just request middleware).
- A clear separation between platform audit logs (admin/config changes) and workflow decision records (who approved an agent action).
- Evidence packs that bundle approvals, policies, sampling outcomes, and integrity proofs, not just request logs.
- Annex IV-style exports that map workflow evidence to required documentation sections.
Pronto all'uso vs da costruire
Una suddivisione equa tra ciò che è disponibile come workflow principale e ciò che va assemblato tra più sistemi.
Pronto all'uso
- Request routing across providers, retries/fallbacks, and standardized access patterns.
- Request-level guardrails and policy enforcement.
- Centralized logging/observability and log exports for downstream systems.
- Enterprise admin features like RBAC and platform audit logs (plan/edition dependent).
- Centralized model governance at the access layer (allowlists/catalogs).
Possibile, ma lo costruite voi
- A workflow approval gate that blocks a high-risk business action until an authorized reviewer approves (with escalation and overrides).
- Decision records tied to business outcomes (what the reviewer saw, why they approved, timestamps, identity).
- A deliverable-shaped evidence pack export mapped to Annex IV/oversight deliverables (manifest + checksums).
- Retention and integrity posture for multi-year audit evidence (often 7+ years in regulated programs).
Esempio concreto di workflow regolamentato
Uno scenario che mostra dove si colloca ciascun livello.
Account closure workflow
An agent drafts a customer-facing account closure email and proposes account closure steps. A gateway can guard the request; regulated operations often also require a decision-time approval gate before a customer is contacted or an account status changes.
Dove Portkey è utile
- Standardize model access and apply request-level guardrails before the LLM is called.
- Log requests/responses centrally for debugging, analytics, and exports.
Dove KLA è utile
- Block the business action (send email / change status) until an authorized reviewer approves.
- Capture approval/override records as workflow decision evidence with context and rationale.
- Export an auditor-ready evidence bundle mapped to deliverables (manifest + checksums).
Decisione rapida
Quando scegliere l'uno o l'altro (e quando acquistare entrambi).
Scegliete Portkey quando
- Your main problem is standardizing provider access, routing, guardrails, and spend controls.
Scegliete KLA quando
- Your main problem is governing workflow decisions and producing audit-ready evidence exports.
- You need role-aware queues and escalation for high-risk actions.
Quando non acquistare KLA
- You only need request routing/guardrails and are not producing audit artifacts from workflow decisions.
Se acquistate entrambi
- Use Portkey at the request layer for routing and guardrails.
- Use KLA above the workflow layer for approvals, sampling, and evidence exports.
Cosa KLA non fa
- KLA is not a request gateway/proxy; it does not aim to replace your provider routing and middleware guardrails.
- KLA is not a model-provider abstraction layer.
- KLA is not a prompt experimentation suite.
Il ciclo di controllo di KLA (Governare / Misurare / Dimostrare)
Cosa significa "evidenze di livello audit" in termini di funzionalità di prodotto.
Governare
- Checkpoint policy-as-code che bloccano o richiedono revisione per le azioni ad alto rischio.
- Code di approvazione basate sui ruoli, escalation e override registrati come record decisionali.
Misurare
- Revisioni a campione basate sul rischio (baseline + intensificate durante incidenti o dopo modifiche).
- Tracciamento dei near-miss (passaggi bloccati o quasi bloccati) come segnale di controllo misurabile.
Dimostrare
- Traccia di audit tamper-proof, append-only, con timestamping esterno e verifica di integrità.
- Bundle di esportazione dall'Evidence Room (manifesto + checksum) verificabili in modo indipendente dagli auditor.
Nota: alcuni controlli (SSO, workflow di revisione, finestre di conservazione) dipendono dal piano. Consultate /pricing?ref=confronto.
Checklist RFP (scaricabile)
Un artefatto di procurement condivisibile.
# Checklist RFP: KLA vs Portkey Utilizzate questa checklist per valutare se gli strumenti di "osservabilità / gateway / governance" coprono effettivamente i deliverable di audit per workflow regolamentati basati su agenti. ## Requisiti essenziali (deliverable di audit) - Mappatura delle esportazioni in stile Annex IV (campi della documentazione tecnica -> evidenze) - Registri di supervisione umana (code di approvazione, escalation, override) - Piano di monitoraggio post-market + sampling policy basata sul rischio - Traccia di audit tamper-evident (verifiche di integrità + conservazione a lungo termine) ## Chiedete a Portkey (e al vostro team) - Can you enforce decision-time controls (block/review/allow) for high-risk actions in production? - How do you distinguish “human annotation” from “human approval” for business actions? - Can you export a self-contained evidence bundle (manifest + checksums), not just raw logs/traces? - What is the retention posture (e.g., 7+ years) and how can an auditor verify integrity independently? - Show the difference between exporting request logs and exporting a decision evidence pack (approvals, policies, sampling, integrity proofs).
Fonti
Riferimenti pubblici utilizzati per mantenere questa pagina accurata e imparziale.
Nota: le funzionalità dei prodotti cambiano. Se notate informazioni obsolete, segnalatelo tramite /contact?ref=confronto.