Evidence pack checklist (what auditors ask for, and how KLA generates it)
Download an evidence pack checklist: what auditors ask for, minimum vs gold-standard evidence, and how KLA generates verifiable exports.
Assemble an auditor-ready evidence pack checklist in 15 minutes.
For compliance, risk, product, and ML ops teams shipping agentic workflows into regulated environments.
Ultimo aggiornamento: 16 dic 2025 · Versione v1.0 · Campione fittizio. Non costituisce consulenza legale.
Segnala un problema: /contact?ref=risorsa
Cos'è questo artefatto (e quando vi serve)
Spiegazione essenziale minima, scritta per gli audit, non per la teoria.
This checklist is the “conversion hub” for audit readiness: what auditors typically request, grouped by theme, and structured as minimum → strong → gold-standard evidence.
Use it to spot gaps fast and to standardize what your team can export on demand.
Vi serve quando
- You’re getting procurement or audit questions and need a consistent package.
- Your evidence is scattered across tools and you need an exportable bundle.
- You want to map Annex IV claims to actual runtime evidence and review records.
Common failure mode
Evidence exists, but it’s scattered across wikis and dashboards with no manifest, no checksums, and no reproducible “what ran when” trail.
Com'è fatto un buon risultato
Criteri di accettazione che i revisori verificano effettivamente.
- Covers system description, risk management, oversight, validation, monitoring, change control, and logging integrity.
- Defines minimum vs strong vs gold-standard per theme (easy to forward internally).
- Includes export instructions and verification steps (manifest + checksums).
- Links to the actual artifacts/templates used by the team (SOPs, policies, checklists).
Anteprima del template
Un estratto reale in HTML così è indicizzabile e revisionabile.
## 3) Human oversight records - Minimum: oversight SOP + intervention triggers + role definitions - Strong: review queue records (approve/reject/edit/override + rationale) - Gold: sampled review outcomes + disagreement handling + training evidence ## 7) Logging integrity proof & retention - Minimum: audit event taxonomy + retention policy - Strong: integrity mechanism documented + periodic verification reports - Gold: export bundles with manifests + checksums + verification steps
Come compilarlo (rapidamente)
Input necessari, tempo di completamento e un esempio pratico in miniatura.
Input necessari
- Your system inventory + owners.
- Locations of key artifacts (risk register, SOPs, runbooks, eval reports).
- Your export mechanism (what you can bundle + how you verify integrity).
Tempo di completamento: 10–20 minutes to draft, then iterate during export drills.
Mini example: evidence pack manifest entry
manifest.json (excerpt) - bundle_id: kla-export-2025-12-16-001 - includes: audit-log.ndjson, review-queue.csv, policy-pack.tar.gz - checksums: sha256:... - verify: recompute checksums; validate hash chain
Come KLA lo genera (Governare / Misurare / Dimostrare)
Collegate l'artefatto alle primitive di prodotto per favorire la conversione.
Govern
- Governance as enforceable controls (policy-as-code + approval gates), not spreadsheets.
- Change control links every version bump to an approval record.
Measure
- Sampling and near-miss metrics become measurable control effectiveness signals.
- Monitoring outcomes are recorded as evidence, not screenshots.
Prove
- Evidence Room exports package telemetry, approvals, and policies with a manifest + checksums.
- Append-only audit ledger provides tamper-evident proof of execution and interventions.
FAQ
Scritte per ottenere risposte in formato snippet.