Evidence pack checklist (what auditors ask for, and how KLA generates it)
Download an evidence pack checklist: what auditors ask for, minimum vs gold-standard evidence, and how KLA generates verifiable exports.
Assemble an auditor-ready evidence pack checklist in 15 minutes.
For compliance, risk, product, and ML ops teams shipping agentic workflows into regulated environments.
Última actualización: 16 dic 2025 · Versión v1.0 · Muestra ficticia. No asesoramiento legal.
Informar un problema: /contact
Qué es este artefacto (y cuándo lo necesita)
Explicación mínima viable, escrita para auditorías, no para teoría.
This checklist is the “conversion hub” for audit readiness: what auditors typically request, grouped by theme, and structured as minimum → strong → gold-standard evidence.
Use it to spot gaps fast and to standardize what your team can export on demand.
Lo necesita cuando
- You’re getting procurement or audit questions and need a consistent package.
- Your evidence is scattered across tools and you need an exportable bundle.
- You want to map Annex IV claims to actual runtime evidence and review records.
Common failure mode
Evidence exists, but it’s scattered across wikis and dashboards with no manifest, no checksums, and no reproducible “what ran when” trail.
Criterios de exito
Los revisores de los criterios de aceptación realmente verifican.
- Covers system description, risk management, oversight, validation, monitoring, change control, and logging integrity.
- Defines minimum vs strong vs gold-standard per theme (easy to forward internally).
- Includes export instructions and verification steps (manifest + checksums).
- Links to the actual artifacts/templates used by the team (SOPs, policies, checklists).
Vista previa de la plantilla
Un extracto real en HTML para que sea indexable y revisable.
## 3) Human oversight records - Minimum: oversight SOP + intervention triggers + role definitions - Strong: review queue records (approve/reject/edit/override + rationale) - Gold: sampled review outcomes + disagreement handling + training evidence ## 7) Logging integrity proof & retention - Minimum: audit event taxonomy + retention policy - Strong: integrity mechanism documented + periodic verification reports - Gold: export bundles with manifests + checksums + verification steps
Cómo rellenarlo (rápido)
Entradas que necesita, tiempo para completar y un ejemplo resuelto en miniatura.
Entradas que necesita
- Your system inventory + owners.
- Locations of key artifacts (risk register, SOPs, runbooks, eval reports).
- Your export mechanism (what you can bundle + how you verify integrity).
Tiempo para completar: 10–20 minutes to draft, then iterate during export drills.
Mini example: evidence pack manifest entry
manifest.json (excerpt) - bundle_id: kla-export-2025-12-16-001 - includes: audit-log.ndjson, review-queue.csv, policy-pack.tar.gz - checksums: sha256:... - verify: recompute checksums; validate hash chain
Cómo lo genera KLA (Gobernar / Medir / Probar)
Vincula el artefacto con las funcionalidades del producto para facilitar la conversión.
Govern
- Governance as enforceable controls (policy-as-code + approval gates), not spreadsheets.
- Change control links every version bump to an approval record.
Measure
- Sampling and near-miss metrics become measurable control effectiveness signals.
- Monitoring outcomes are recorded as evidence, not screenshots.
Prove
- Evidence Room exports package telemetry, approvals, and policies with a manifest + checksums.
- Append-only audit ledger provides tamper-evident proof of execution and interventions.
Preguntas frecuentes
Redactado para obtener respuestas destacadas en buscadores.
Descargar el artefacto
Markdown editable. No se requiere correo electrónico.
Download the checklist